The Supreme Court of India is currently reviewing its earlier judgment that made 3 years of legal practice mandatory for appearing in judicial service exams.
The Supreme Court on Thursday indicated some concerns about the requirement of three years of legal practice for entry-level judicial service positions, especially noting its possible effect on women candidates.
A bench consisting of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice K. Vinod Chandran, and Justice A.G. Masih was hearing review petitions challenging last year’s decision that had reinstated the three-year practice requirement.
The review is happening through open-court hearings, meaning lawyers are presenting oral arguments again before the bench.
The Court has shown serious concern about the rule’s practical impact, especially on:
fresh law graduates
women candidates
Economically weaker Aspirants
“Most important issue is regarding young girls. Now almost 60% of judicial officer are girls, so that is very important to us. Because of this condition… No doubt practice is important, but we also have to see impact on young talent. This creates a vacuum for 3 years,” CJI said.
judges observed that the rule may unintentionally create entry barriers rather than improving judicial quality.
At the same time, the Court acknowledged that practical courtroom experience is important for becoming a competent judge.
The Court has asked High Courts and National Law Universities to submit their views and data on:
recruitment standard
quality of judges
impact of the rule
Final decision is still pending — the rule is under reconsideration, not yet struck down or changed.
Why This News Is Important for Judiciary Aspirants
Your eligibility rules may change soon depending on the final verdict.
If modified, fresh graduates could again become eligible directly after law degree.
This case is highly exam-relevant for:prelims current affairs main essay interview discussions.
The Supreme Court is reconsidering the 3-year practice rule for judicial service entry, raising concerns about fairness, accessibility, and its real impact on aspiring judges.
